Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05307
Original file (BC 2013 05307.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-05307
		COUNSEL:  NO
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO 


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active 
Duty, be changed to reflect that he was awarded a 7-skill level in 
Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) 2A5X1 (Aircraft Maintenance).


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His AF Form 623, On-The-Job Training (OJT) Records reflect he 
completed all the required core tasks for award of his 7-level.  
He attended 7-level school; however, his flight chief did not 
submit the paperwork because he was separating to become an 
officer.  His flight chief stated “it was a waste of time.”  
Denying someone something they worked hard to receive and deserve 
is appalling.  
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his DD 
Form 214, AF Form 623, excerpts from his Verification of Military 
Experience and Training Report and various other documents 
associated with his appeal.  
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant’s DD Form 214, issued in conjunction with his 
13 Jan 99, discharge, block 11, Primary Specialty, reflects AFSC 
2A551J (Aircraft Maintenance).


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial.  The applicant did not submit the 
required documentation for upgrade.  He must submit a copy of the 
Craftsman Course training certificate, AF Form 2096, 
Classification/On-the-Job-Training Action, awarding him the 7-
skill level or PC-III print out approving the 7-skill level, and 
additional AF Forms 623, if available.  Once the additional source 
documents are received, an approval may be granted.
The complete DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit B. 


APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 28 Feb 14, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C).  
As of this date, no response has been received by this office. 


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

1.  The application was timely filed.

2.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  In this 
respect, we note this Board is the highest level of administrative 
appeal within the Air Force.  As such, an applicant must first 
exhaust all available avenues of administrative relief provided by 
existing law or regulations prior to seeking relief before this 
Board, as required by the governing Air Force Instruction.  The 
Air Force office of primary responsibility has reviewed this 
application and indicted there is an available avenue of possible 
administrative relief the applicant has not exhausted.  In view of 
this, we find that consideration of the applicant’s appeal by this 
Board is not appropriate at this time.  Therefore, the applicant 
is advised that if he is not successful in obtaining the relief he 
seeks through available administrative channels, he may then 
consider resubmitting his appeal to this Board.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that he has not exhausted all available 
avenues of administrative relief prior to submitting his 
application to the BCMR; and the application will only be 
reconsidered upon exhausting all subordinate avenues of 
administrative relief.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2013-05307 in Executive Session on 19 Aug 14, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	Panel Chair
	Member
	Member



The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-05307 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 7 Nov 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 8 Jan 13.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Feb 14.



3

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00831

    Original file (BC 2014 00831.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSIDE recommends denial of the applicant’s request related to his EPR, indicating the applicant has not exhausted all available avenues of administrative relief prior to seeking correction of his military record. The Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) will not consider a case until all avenues of administrative relief have been exhausted. The Air Force office of primary responsibility has reviewed...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02834

    Original file (BC-2011-02834.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The applicant requests Block 11 of his DD Form 214 be changed to reflect T42399, Master Instructor and Aircraft Electrical Superintendent. The complete DPSIDC evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit F. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reiterated the errors on his DD Form 214.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02534

    Original file (BC-2005-02534.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    AF Form 2096, Classification/On-the-Job Training Action, dated 10 December 1973, indicates the applicant was assigned a Primary and Duty Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) of 43171C, Aircraft Maintenance Technician. Retirement Order AC-32827, dated 9 November 1973, indicates the following: date relieved from active duty - 31 January 1974 with a retirement date of 1 February 1974. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04057

    Original file (BC 2013 04057.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibilities (OPRs) which are included at Exhibits C, D, E and F. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: USAF/A3O-AIF recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the award of the Aeronautical Badge because she did not have at least 36 months of operational flying to be permanently awarded the Aircrew Member Badge. In accordance with Air Force Instruction 36-3203,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04656

    Original file (BC-2010-04656.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDC provides no recommendation, stating, in part, that in the absence of specific source documentation that validates the requested corrective action, they could not determine with any certainty the length of time the applicant performed in each of the Air Force Specialty Codes (AFSCs) and the skill level he attained. The complete AFPC/DPSIDC evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03082

    Original file (BC 2013 03082.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03082 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His AF Form 3008, Supplement to Enlistment Agreement-United States Air Force, be amended to reflect participation in the Enlisted College Loan Repayment Plan (ECLRP). In this respect, we note this Board is the highest administrative level of appeal...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03959

    Original file (BC 2013 03959.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    According to an SAF/MRBR Action Request, dated 31 Jul 14, the applicant’s DD Form 214, Block 15b, Commissioned through ROTC Scholarship, will be administratively corrected to reflect “Yes.” AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DPSIT recommends denial of the applicant’s request to add the Space and Missile Intelligence Formal Training course to her DD Form 214. The Office of Primary Responsibility (OPR) for the DD Form 214, using the regulatory guidance for the DD Form 214 content at the time of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03185

    Original file (BC 2013 03185 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    __________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Upon completion of Basic Training he completed B-47 Bomber training after approximately six months. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03095

    Original file (BC 2014 03095.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03095 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect he was awarded a 5-skill level in the Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) 2A551, Aerospace Maintenance Journeyman. On 18 Oct 11, the applicant earned his 5-skill level in the AFSC 2A551, Aerospace Maintenance...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02639

    Original file (BC-2012-02639.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. According to the applicant's statement, he was a member of the Air Force Reserve for about 3 years and 3 months. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 14 Feb 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR...